After reading the book, I have found two different styles of writing that Paul uses. Either he has great skill in creating more than one style, or I have far too limited vocabulary that I call the "normal" style within the book "stylish." He has the simple language, and the eloquent language.
Simple Language: When Saul did not have any needs for "scrumptious" words, such as when explaining a character or situation, he would use language without much inner meanings inside. This may be easier for the reader to understand, but does not leave a lasting impression. For example, when he does not want the reader to think much on what he is writing, he uses "hollow" phrases such as "Dad was a hit with women" (Bellow, 17). While this may provoke some thoughts on what Kenneth's dad does, it does require much extra thinking to understand what's being implied.
Eloquent Language: Now this is when things get cloudy. Once Bellow wants the reader to eat the words, to inhale it all in and think deeply about them, he begins to give the reader lots of food to consume. Much of this novel has this type of eloquent language, which has left me biting the dust countless times.
"The earnest student is immersed in the Psilophyta, the Arthrophyta, the Pterophyta, and instead of being blasted away beyond the moon, he hold a universtiy chair" (Bellow, 20-21).
The only way I found out what Psilophyta meant was searching it up, and the definition had to do something about plants. This relates to Uncle in some way, and that's only the first layer in the layer of meanings.
~Pitaah
WELCOME!!!
Now... before you Die of Hearbreak due to all of the posts and craziness under me, I would like to explain a bit on how this blog works. So... to my right, I have this thing called "Labels." It is recommended that you start on the "An Introduction" before venturing off at your free will, but choose what you will. Anyways, I have also responded to my own posts, which you can find by clicking on the "comments" under each post. I hope you enjoy your stay here and learn something new about "More Die of Heartbreak" by Saul Bellow! :)
Monday, March 28, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
After reading the explanation of style within the book, I cannot say that I completely agree with it. I agree that not being a botanist would severely limit vocabulary in such confusing terms, but that does not always necessarily mean that it will contain inner meanings. However, I must agree that Saul Bellow does incorporate much meanings within the skin of the words that readers are entitled to dig out, which is probably why this book is so strong, so mind-boggling.
ReplyDelete~Kenneth Trachtenberg